blueollie

Caught up..and a bit of Bradley Basketball

Sunday afternoon: I caught the Bradley Women’s game; they beat Southern Illinois 58-53 in overtime.

View this post on Instagram

Bradley leading Southern Illinois early

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

BU held SIU to only 4 points in the first quarter and lead for much of the game, mostly by double digits. But Southern rallied and even took a 4 point lead late in the game. BU rallied and had the ball with the score tied and just under 30 seconds to go..but ended up botching the play.

SIU took a 4 point lead early in overtime but BU rallied to finally get the lead with about 1 minute to go (getting several key rebounds) and then hit two key free throws and made yet another monster stop to ice the game.

A nice touch: the softball team and track team showed up for Sunday’s game (baseball team showed up for Friday’s game)

View this post on Instagram

Men's track team cheering on the women.

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

Then I got to see the men come back to beat SIU on the road 57-54 on ESPNU.

Workout notes:

Sunday: nothing but partner yoga (tired)
Monday: weights then 2 mile run in 19:33 (last mile in 8:50, lane 2). weights: usual PT, planks, etc. pull ups 15-15-10-10, sore shoulder so incline: 10 x 135, 5 x 150, decline: 8 x 165, military: 10 x 50 stand 15 x 50 seated (supported), 10 x 45, rows: 10 x 110 machine (2 sets) 1 set of 10 x 60 dumbbell, then the run
Tuesday: yoga with Ms. V, run (44:50 treadmill, 30:43 lane 1 of the Riverplex walking)
weight: 193 Monday, 193.8 before (TMI), 189.9 after the workout.

January 23, 2019 Posted by | basketball, running, walking, weight training | , | Leave a comment

Behind the times, scroll past phrases, etc.

Someone on Twitter posted this:

So I responded: “yes, my life HAS improved” (in many ways anyway); in my case I got a promotion, got some raises and had a reduction in expense (daughter graduated from college, debt free) and yes, my retirement account went up in value.

And I got some angry responses. I must be in denial as “only the richest benefited” (nope: here is how the tax cuts worked; we had a modest reduction)

Yes, my retirement account is stock based. And yes, it is up…from a January 2017 baseline.

(stocks were overvalued at the peak; I didn’t pay attention to that).

And some people just couldn’t accept my answer. And some thought “well, you must be a Trump supporter who doesn’t care about others.”

Uh, I can say that I didn’t vote Trump in 2016 and that, well, I’ll vote for the D nominee in 2020, even if it is a rubber chicken.

But it is a mistake to think that *everyone* but the ultra rich are suffering; it is possible to have improvements in one’s financial life that are independent of Trump policies.

And it is no longer the case that “rich vote R, poor vote D”. That was mostly true at one time..but not so much anymore. Via CNN:

By income it was pretty much “even-Steven”.

Our country and the world, on the whole, HAS changed and what was once broadly true when I was an undergraduate is no longer true.

Scroll past phrases
There are some phrases that..when I see them, I almost automatically “scroll past”. One is “toxic masculinity.”
Yes, I saw that horrible video of an elderly Native American being taunted by some very unpleasant “MAGA” hat wearing brats. But someone tried to make the case that this was an example of “toxic masculinity” in action.

Oh boy. Yes, sometimes groups of people act worse in a group than they would individually. But that can be true of women as well (think: “mean girls”).

Yes, women can act in hideous ways too, though there isn’t always symmetry. Statistically, men and women ARE different, but both are fully capable of evil.

Workout notes: getting ready to go do partner yoga.

Yesterday: shoveling (road to alley) part II; this time it was fluffy stuff (easier than the wetter, heavier, deeper stuff on Friday). But it tired me out enough to limit myself to 5 “mostly walking” miles on the treadmill (perhaps jogged 1/2 of a mile total..much of the walking was at 13:40 or so) 1:10:30 for 5 miles total (last mile at 15:30).

January 20, 2019 Posted by | economy, political/social, politics, politics/social, social/political, walking, whining | | 1 Comment

Men, valedictorians, razors, etc.

I admitted that I am starting to chuckle over the mini-uproar over the Gillette commercial.

To me, it is just silly, dreary winger wagging that we sometimes have to put up with in work training sessions. But as far as Gillete’s history:

Gee…why put the company name right on their shiny butts? For more on the history of this:

In 2011, razor company Gillette, which this week joined the social justice circus, sponsored the grid girls at Formula One’s Easter Races Zandvoort, an annual event in The Netherlands. Here are some images – strictly for research purposes – of the wonderful ladies of the grid sporting skintight Gillette advertisements.

[…]

Gillette is not suddenly under new ownership. It has been owned by corporate titan Proctor & Gamble since 2005. Rather, corporate sentiments change over time, responding to culture shifts. That is most likely the cause of Gillette’s new advertising schtick.

Yes, the site I linked to is right wing, but ..facts are facts and the stated opinion seems reasonable to me…and my guess is that their marketing told them that they’d get a greater market share this way.

And speaking of men:

Last week, however, the American Psychological Association entered the fray with the release of its long-planned “Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men.”

The A.P.A. guidelines argue that the socialization of males to adhere to components of “traditional masculinity such as emotional stoicism, homophobia, not showing vulnerability, self-reliance and competitiveness” leads to the disproportion of males involved in “aggression and violence as a means to resolve interpersonal conflict” as well as “substance abuse, incarceration, and early mortality.”

The premise underlying the guidelines is summarized in a descriptive essay on the A.P.A.’s website: “Traditional masculinity — marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance and aggression — is, on the whole, harmful.”

But this isn’t physics…and there is some mainstream pushback against said study:

From a more academic vantage point, Steven Pinker, a professor of psychology at Harvard, replied to my inquiry with a detailed critique of the A.P.A. guidelines.

“The report is blinkered by two dogmas. One is the doctrine of the blank slate” that rejects biological and genetic factors, Pinker wrote, adding that

The word “testosterone” appears nowhere in the report, and the possibility that men and women’s personalities differ for biological reasons is unsayable and unthinkable.

The other dogma, Pinker argued,

is that repressing emotions is bad and expressing them is good — a folk theory with roots in romanticism, Freudian psychoanalysis, and Hollywood, but which is contradicted by a large literature showing that people with greater self-control, particularly those who repress anger rather than “venting,” lead healthier lives: they get better grades, have fewer eating disorders, drink less, have fewer psychosomatic aches and pains, are less depressed, anxious, phobic, and paranoid, have higher self-esteem, are more conscientious, have better relationships with their families, have more stable friendships, are less likely to have sex they regretted, are less likely to imagine themselves cheating in a monogamous relationship.

In Pinker’s view, the A.P.A. guidelines fail to recognize that

a huge and centuries-long change in Western history, starting from the Middle Ages, was a “Civilizing Process” in which the ideal of manhood changed from a macho willingness to retaliate violently to an insult to the ability to exert self-control, dignity, reserve, and duty. It’s the culture of the gentleman, the man of dignity and quiet strength, the mensch. The romantic 1960s ethic of self-expression and escape from inhibitions weakened that ethic, and the A.P.A. report seems to be trying to administer the coup de grâce.

Pinker suggested rather that

One could argue that what today’s men need is more encouragement to enhance one side of the masculine virtues — the dignity, responsibility, self-control, and self-reliance — while inhibiting others, such as machismo, violence, and drive for dominance.

There is much more there, including some who respond to Pinker. I found the discussion to be interesting and useful.

And talking about success: a recent study on valedictorians from Boston public schools found some disappointing results. In general, valedictorians, on the whole, did better than that group, though they didn’t have earth shaking success.

According to the second article, high schools tend to reward conformity and doing well in all subjects rather than being super excellent in a single subject, and life tends to really reward the latter.

And the prime movers and shakers tend to, at least eventually, non-conform (though, of course, non-conformists really are not that successful on the whole either; the ones we read about are the outliers).

And I think about it: I remember making B’s in high school geometry because I was lax with homework…why spending time doing stuff that I already knew how to do? And our “top 10” students in high school: most were not that impressive. And..it is HIGH SCHOOL. High school. Success at that level tells you..well, not that much.

Workout notes: weights (rotator cuff), pull ups: 4 sets of 10, 5-5, then 5 then 3 at the end of the workout. planks, etc. bench: 10 x 135, 2 x 185 (empty gym), 6 x 165 (didn’t care), 10 x 135 (more intense), 10 x 50 standing, 10 x 45, 10 x 180 machine, 3 sets of 10 x 110 rows, planks, etc.

Treadmill: walked 2 miles in 30:18 starting at 16:10 mile .05-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 increasing speed toward the end, then 2 minutes with Jacob’s ladder. I’d like to work up to 15.

January 18, 2019 Posted by | education, social/political, walking, weight training | Leave a comment

A new politics, tone and twilight zones…

I found this article which compares Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Donald Trump to be interesting: Yes, the personalities are different, but there are similarities:

1. Ignorance. Yes, POTUS should be held to a higher standard than a Freshman representative. But at times, she seems to be unconcerned that there is a lot that she doesn’t know or simply unaware that she doesn’t know.

2. Attacking those of your own party: both seem to be most comfortable doing this; in AOC’s case, she seems more interested in pushing blue district representatives to the left than flipping red ones. The issue here is that, in order to get something through Congress, one has to compromise and for those on the left, that means voting for something more centrist than you’d rather have.

3. Rabid followers on twitter.

4. Attitude. Trump: “I alone can fix it.” AOC:

I still think that this is a nice piece though someone on my Twitter feed objected to this:

I think it’s fair to say that, like Trump, she has no interest in apologizing or co-opting or persuading. She’s here to chew bubblegum and kick ass—and she’s all out of bubblegum.

Oh well.

Now will AOC be an internet flash in the pan or is she the future..or perhaps a useful decoy while others do the heavy lifting? Who knows…certainly not I.

Razors:

I don’t watch TV (much) and really don’t pay attention to commercials. Some conservative are up in arms about it (Ann Coulter has been tweeting stuff about it too).

Personally, this commercial makes me roll my eyes. It reminds me of the stupid training that we are forced to do: yeah, bullying, and harassment are bad (duh) but constant finger wagging is tiresome. It is kind of like religious nutters beating their Bibles over and over again. But it is hardly getting worked up over; it is merely another stupid, clumsy attempt to moralize.

Oh…when I do buy razors…I’ll get whatever is on sale. 🙂

Basketball:

It was looking good early; BU hit a free throw to take a 9-7 lead with 13:36 to go in the half. Bradley didn’t score again until there was 5 minutes left in the half to make it 22-11 …and BU was to trail 33-15 at the half. 6 points in 13:36…frankly BU was lucky to be down by 18: BU shot 15 percent for the first half.

The lead was to climb to 44-20 with 15:38 to go in the game; Drake then went into the “burn the clock mode” and coast to an easy 69-52 win. BU started to make some baskets but by then, the lead was too great to overcome by doing slightly better than trading baskets.

This has to be so frustrating for the team and coaches….hope they can get some confidence back. Take nothing away from Drake; they are a fine team which appears to have adjusted to losing their best player for the season (knee injury). But BU has enough talent to be more competitive than this, especially at home. The game was NOT as close as the 17 point final spread might suggest (and 17 points isn’t hardly close).

Workout notes: Yesterday; 3 miles on the track (25 laps of lane 1 in Markin 45:46) after light weights: rotator cuff, pull ups (11 sets of 5), dumbbell bench 10 x 70, incline 10 x 140, decline: 10 x 165, military: 10 x 50 standing, 15 x 50 seated, supported, 10 x 45, rows: 3 sets of 10 x 45, plank, etc.

This morning: yoga with Ms. V. (and it DOES help), followed by 5 miles of treadmill running: gradual progression every .25 miles: 21:20 for 2, 39:40 for 4, walk for about .4, then jog to 52:50 for 5.

Weight: 193.0 but I was full (TMI), 191.8 prior to the run which is more realistic. I appear to be 192 plus/minus 2 lb. Can I lose 12 more pounds BEFORE I start training?

January 17, 2019 Posted by | basketball, Democrats, politics, politics/social, running, walking, weight training | | Leave a comment

Women’s basketball, snow and men

This is how I remember them:

Andrea McAllister was a senior when I got to Bradley and a scorer; she got 33 points in one of the games I attended (vs. Missouri, I believe). Vicki Hall was a big time scorer and star on Jody Conradt’s powerhouse Texas basketball team; they habitually went to the regional finals (and won it all the first year I was there; made the final 4 the second year I was there). Good stuff. In one of Hall’s games, she played in front of 14,000 spirited fans.

Well now they are college coaches and today, McAllister’s Bradley Braves beat Hall’s Sycamores (Indiana State) 61-46, to complete a two game sweep of the Indiana trip (to move to 12-3 and 2-2 in the Missouri Valley). Bradley beat Evansville 75-68 (EU is not a good team right now).

Time flies.

I can’t wait to see ISU blue visit Bradley. Of course I’ll cheer for the Braves, as usual. But this is the first time the opposing coaches would have been players that I used to cheer for!

Oh, yes, I (and perhaps 2000 others) made the snow-affected (attendance wise) Bradley vs. Missouri State game.

Bradley lead by 2 at the half (30-28) and had a 14 point lead with 14:46 to go (48-34). I thought “ok, this is just what we need to snap out of our funk; the team had been 2-7 over the past 9 games..after a promising start. With 12:40 to go the lead had been cut to 9. And so it went..Missouri State gradually chipped away and took the lead with 43 seconds to go and BU withered. Final was 69-64, with BU being outscored 35-16 over the final 15 minutes of the game.

I did not like the team’s body language; it appeared to be one of those “here we go again” reactions.

View this post on Instagram

Snowmageddon game. Mo. St. at Bradley.

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

View this post on Instagram

Was it something I said?

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

View this post on Instagram

It WAS a 14 point Bradley lead. Now we trail by 1.

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

Oh well.

Snow affected the attendance ..I was able to catch a ride from the Field House shuttle.

View this post on Instagram

Bleah.

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

View this post on Instagram

Ugh.

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

We got 10.7 inches in a day, slightly above the 95 percent confidence interval.

Workout notes; cursing and snow shoveling yesterday and last night..and this morning…
10K walking on the treadmill (1:11:40 for 6, 1:14 for 10K with the final mile in 11:15). It was a quick but not “all out” walk. If/when I can build up to 20 in 4:15 on this treadmill (yes, I’ve done that before), I should be ready for a good walking marathon.

January 13, 2019 Posted by | basketball, Peoria, Personal Issues, walking | , | Leave a comment

Trying to get it together ..

So what will the Democrats do in 2020? Oh sure, there is still the shutdown to deal with.

But the eventual nominee will have to navigate the respective..well, “power centers” in Democratic politics. And, as of right now, I am clueless as to who to back.

Political skill will be a huge consideration; agreeing with me on positions means little if one either loses the election or wins the election and can’t get their stuff past Congress.

Workout notes: I mentioned my run yesterday. Today: I decided to skip weights and walk instead; (5.1 miles at about a 16 minute pace..too damned slow). I had dry roads; snow is supposed to arrive late tonight and stay tomorrow. I hope I can make it to the Bradley game.

January 11, 2019 Posted by | Democrats, politics, politics/social, running, walking | Leave a comment

workout catch up

Ok, just catching up.

Monday: weight: 191.4 Did weights: pull ups (5 sets of 10), bench: 10 x 135, 3 x 185, 5 x 170, 5 x 165 decline, military: 10 x 50 standing, 15 x 50 seated, 10 x 45, rows: 3 sets of 10 x 50 each arm, plank, etc.
Tuesday: weight: 189.9 run: treadmill: 11:02, 21:05, 30:50, 31:46, then 3 mile walk outside. Right knee pain, due to tight calf (stretched it..then it was ok)
Wednesday: weight: 191.8. walk: 3 outside, after weights: pull ups (5 sets of 10) incline bench: 10 x 135, 4 x 150, decline: 6 x 160, military: 10 x 50, 10 x 45, 10 x 40 standing, rows: 3 sets of 10 x 110 machine, plank, etc. after. Then yoga with Ms. V in the evening.

January 10, 2019 Posted by | running, walking, weight training | Leave a comment

And the Democrats, predictably, start to disappoint.

I am feeling a bit down about Congress. Yeah, I know; relax, as long as the Senate is being held by Republicans, not much will happen. I’ve heard noise about Republicans attempting to pressure McConnell to hold a vote on the shutdown, but nothing will happen until McConnell’s majority leader position is threatened. He cares only about his own power.

But what I am seeing from Democrats makes me shake my head in disgust.

On one hand, you have the level headed, even tempered “good old fashioned Midwestern common sense” Cheri Bustos parroting insipid nonsense:

Yes, that is a bad idea.

Yes, there is a time and place for austerity and a time and place for deficit spending. But that is counterintuitive to those who think of public debt in terms of private debt; the two things are different animals, entirely.

Austerity might be ok NOW but why tie our hands if a recession strikes?

On the other side, we have Democrats acting like angry drunks.

If this is really you..well, I was hoping that we’d counter incompetence with competence and vulgarity with class, but perhaps that isn’t they way things work any more.

And you see, some are really ok with this:

That is just what we need…the public needs to see HOW ANGRY WE ARE and..well, they’ll get angry too!

Well, color be skeptical. Our most successful national politicians included quite a bit of persuasion in their pitches. Yes, white hot rage might work for the Trumpsters but their coalition is less diverse than ours; our coalition is more easily fractured.

Here is but one example. (The assumption behind this headline appears to be that Israel cannot exist as a diverse state in the way that the US does; I welcome correction from those who know more. I favor a 2-state solution based on, well, history and the seeming inability of the sides to get along, but the “everyone together” does appeal to the romantic in me. My hope could well be delusional. In any event, the author of this post is well versed on this issue and I am not.)

The good news is that the dancing and walking are fun.

I suppose that I will be constantly reminded that candidates and parties are package deals; I will NOT like every aspect of every Democrat and I will disapprove of at least some of the positions of the candidates that I will vote for.

Workout notes: weights, 2 mile walk. Felt a bit tired after the weights:

rotator cuff, pull ups (5 sets of 10, went well) bench 10 x 135, 2 x 185, 5 x 170, incline: 10 x 135, military: 10 x 50 standing, 15 x 50 seated, 10 x 180 machine, rows: 3 sets of 10 x 50 dumbbell, plank (2:30) side plank, head stand, then 2 mile walk outside. Not 100 percent, but MUCH stronger than 2 days ago. MUCH stronger.

Weight: 191.8; it appears that my honest weight is 191.5 pm 3 lbs. That is ok, given that I haven’t started training yet, but that sub 6 hour marathon walk won’t happen at this weight. It could happen at 10 pounds less.

January 4, 2019 Posted by | politics, politics/social, social/political, walking, weight training | Leave a comment

Mancold V 2 and twitter

I was going to say all sorts of stuff but got sucked into a Twitter debate with a Trump supporter. Her reasoning skills weren’t bad but she was working from a base of misinformation (terrorists in the caravan, smallpox in the caravan, etc. and if you start with bad assumptions, you will end up in an ignorant place. Remember that those who believed in geocentric astronomy were not idiots; those epicycles they worked out were difficult math problems.

There is more but I’ll just shut up and see how Congress does.

Cold: much better; dare I say that the walk went reasonably well. It seems that I buy cold medicine just AFTER I need it. 🙂

(4 mile walk today).

January 4, 2019 Posted by | illness, walking | Leave a comment

My 2018 in Review

Photos only; I’ve done this in 2015, 2016 and 2017. I’ve arranged these in approximate chronological order.

Note: I’ll mention today’s mundane 5 mile walk. It was done in drizzly, chilly (40’s) conditions. I would have been worse. I could have been better. but it was ok. Miles: 1803. 4.94 miles per day. Yes, I had a minor annoyance. That was typical of the year; just enough to complain about, but nothing major..good enough. 2018 was “good enough.” Not outstanding, not terrible, but good enough.


January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September


October

November


December

December 31, 2018 Posted by | family, Friends, running, walking | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment