Mike Tyson as Herman Cain…

November 11, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Herman Cain, political humor, politics, republicans, republicans politics | Leave a comment

Oh, the Hermanity! – The Daily Show with Jon Stewart – 11/09/11 – Video Clip | Comedy Central

Luckily, Herman Cain still has one important person in his corner. Airdate – 11/09/11

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Oh, the Hermanity! – The Daily Show with Jon St…, posted with vodpod

November 10, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Herman Cain, political humor, politics, republicans | Leave a comment

Republican Debate
Normally, I don’t care for the “x things we learned from the debate” but this one at CNN is ok.

Paul Krugman and other liberals are delighted at Rick Perry’s implosion (couldn’t remember WHICH agencies that he would cut). Nate Silver says that while he isn’t completely finished, he is probably a second tier candidate now.

Who believes Herman Cain? Well, here are two different polls, focus on the Republican men vs. Republican women:

In the Pew poll, Republican women are more skeptical of the charges. In the Gallup, the Republican women are LESS skeptical of the charges! What gives? Note: “n” is higher in the Gallup but “n” is still respectable in the Pew poll.

Can you guess the real difference? Surf to the article to find out.

Intrade: Perry has dropped to 4 percent, and Gingrich has “soared” to almost 10 percent.

Oh yes, Obama is over 50 percent again, at least as of this morning:

November 10, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Barack Obama, Herman Cain, Mitt Romney, politics, poll, republicans, republicans politics, rick perry, statistics | Leave a comment

cnbc Republican debate: Cliche Fest…and Perry can’t remember which agencies he’ll eliminate!!!

Topic One: Italy financial crisis.

Cain: doesn’t answer the question
Romney: let ’em fail and those banks that have Italian bonds..
Paul: Let ’em fail
Huntsman: banks are too big… (sounds like government regulation)

Auto Industry
Romeny: called out on his flip-flop on auto bailout.
Answer: waffles Claims that he doesn’t flip flop. Claims that the Obama is behind the flip-flop charge, never apologize for the USA. ????

Perry: asked if leaders need some flexibility. Says America will be America “again”???? Too big??

Gingrich: asked about Bernake’s statement. Asked about tax reform.
Gingrich responds: fire Bernake. Lower taxes, less regulation, no class warfare????
(*cuking idiot)

Bachmann: “taxes lead to jobs leaving the country”…speaks gibberish….why is this idiot here? “legalize American energy?”

Santorum: asked about his zero tax for manufacturing…..blames government in making us uncompetitive.

Cain: asked about the claims of sexual harassment (gets booed):
Response: shouldn’t be tried in the court of public opinion, gets cheered. Still didn’t say 9-9-9.

Romney: are you persuaded (boos). Says: Mr. Cain can respond, acknowledged cheers.

Huntsman: says he wants to be the President of the 99 percent AND of the 1 percent. Talks about the banks being too big to fail. No more bailouts, he says.

Romney: do companies have a responsibility to make money only. Lies about profit not enriching the executives: they get capital gains. What a liar.

Perry: his 20 percent flat tax….

Gingrich: takes a shot at the Occupy Wall street, academics and pundits. Yeah, he brings out a couple of exceptions and the idiots cheer. Gingrich is asked “what inaccurate reporting”; he can’t answer.

Blah blah….

My goodness; I think Bachmann is an idiot. I think that she and Santorum are there as props to make Romney look sane.

Paul is talking about interest rates being too low.

Seriously, the debate should be limited to Romney, Paul, Cain and Perry.

Now Romney is blaming the government for the bad loans….what a liar (or an idiot). Again, it wasn’t the government making banks loan to poor people that caused the mortgage crisis.

Huntsman is the only one making any sense at all; pity that he has no chance.

Repeal Obamacare question
Let’s see how anyone answers the preexisting condition
Huntsman: cost containment, states
Paul: medical savings accounts
Cain: HR 3000…”princess Nancy”
Romney: return to the states the uninsured…”more like a market”, “malpractice”
Gingrich: no 30 second answer he says.
Bachmann: Own insurance policies drive the prices down???
Santorum: claims that he lead on government out of the health care business…

Do these people do anything other than mouth stale cliches?

Highlights: Romney accuses Obama of putting his reelection ahead of problem solving (hypocrite). Perry: brags about poaching Caterpillar.

Vows to eliminate Commerce, Education and an agency that he can’t remember….he can’t name it!!!!!! FAIL…..

Gingrich will keep the payroll tax cut.

Romney whines about public service employees….

Some say that they disagree with the payroll tax cuts.

Bachmann: gibberish. cut her off…thank goodness.

Gingrich: blames student loans for cost……talks about administrator cost.

Mentions College of the Ozarks. This is the first “new” thing I took away.

Oh yes, Perry wants to do away with the Department of Energy (which controls nuclear weapons and nuclear power…)

Great: Perry of all people is telling us how to fix higher education.

Romney: calls out the Chinese for cheating….this was over a decision to buy parts from China to build parts for a California bridge.

How would you crack down on China?
Answer: call them currency manipulator. Tariffs to the Chinese.

Gingrich: blames American labor and regulations.

Huntsman: no easy answers. Talks about “applause lines”. Calls Romney’s policy pandering. Warns of trade wars.

Perry: can’t talk; breaks down into gibberish.

November 10, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Herman Cain, Mitt Romney, politics, politics/social, republicans political/social, republicans politics, rick perry | 2 Comments

Shut up you fat bimbo!!! Ok, Cain’s PAC did NOT say that…

Workout notes Walked 4 miles on the university track: 13:15 warm up mile, 11:21, 11:01, 9:42 for 45:20. As usual the first mile was to warm up, next was 2-1-2-1-2, next was 1-3-1-3 and then the last was 1-7. In the last mile I wanted to pass as many slow runners as possible; the knee was probably not legal though I did NOT lift.

Then swimming: 2200 yards: 500 fist/free, 500 back/free, 500 side/free, 500 pull, 200 free. Routine.

Aches/Pains: somewhat sore back at times; I was a bit heavy legged from yesterdays runs/squats.


From Herman Cain’s PAC website:

Click for the larger photo.

This is NOT an official Herman Cain site but rather, well, you can see the details of who actually owns the site here:

A WHOIS lookup of that domain gives:

15408 n 39th street
Phoenix, Arizona 85032
United States
Registered through:, Inc. (
Created on: 03-Dec-10
Expires on: 03-Dec-12
Last Updated on: 02-Jan-11

Administrative Contact:
hoelz, clifford
15408 n 39th street
Phoenix, Arizona 85032
United States
+1.6027173345 Fax — +1.6027887660

Technical Contact:
hoelz, clifford
15408 n 39th street
Phoenix, Arizona 85032
United States
+1.6027173345 Fax — +1.6027887660

Hmmm…sounds like Mr. Clifford Hoelz of “IBC” (whatever that is) has some ‘splainin to do…

by Brainwrap on Wed Nov 09, 2011 at 09:43:35 AM PST

Hat tip: Dr. Andy.

Before Dr. Andy gets too smug though: were I like some of the GOP field, I’d just say that the claims that this site was not authentic were made up by the “lamestream media” or something.


Watch Joe “I don’t pay no stinking child support) Walsh (R-IL14) get OWNED by his constituents…and lose his temper:

Moral: when you don’t have the facts, TALK LOUDER. That is the Republican way! πŸ™‚

ps: this is not a hoax and the far more important of the two items.

November 9, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, economy, Herman Cain, politics, politics/social, republican party, republicans, social/political | 2 Comments

Popcorn Post II

These are intrade odds; note that “Paterno will resign” was over 80 percent earlier today.

But the Cain campaign “scandal” has been the most entertaining news for me today.

Some Cain supporter reaction:

Now Druge is breaking the “story” that the accuser was once fired for filing false sexual harassment charges:

One might be asking themselves why Ms. Bialek was fired from the National Restaurant Association. After all, being fired, quite unlike simply being laid off, is a serious issue with serious ramifications; since leaving the Restuarant Association, Ms. Bialek has been unable to maintain regular employment. So why was this woman let go? Why has it seemingly affected her ability to remain employed for so long? Perhaps it might have something to do with the reason she was fired from the National Restaurant Association in the first place… FILING FALSE CLAIMS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT “She was fired from her job, and her boyfriend suggested she contact Cain in hopes he could help her find employment.”.

Now I trust Druge about as far as I could throw a 300 pound barbell.

Who knows? Rick Perry must be laughing his @ss off right now.

What is interesting is how some of my liberal acquaintances have acted: the guys have been mostly “wait and see” whereas the more vocal feminists were all into the “off with his head”; evidently in their mind, accusation is the same as guilt.

I’ll say it again: there has to be at least some evidence to substantiate a charge, else anyone can charge anyone. The most damning evidence against Mr. Cain is his history of accusers being paid quite a bit of money.

So, though this latest accuser doesn’t strike me as credible, there are the other charges where there are actual settlements.

November 9, 2011 Posted by | Herman Cain, political/social, politics, rick perry, social/political | Leave a comment

I will not laugh…

November 8, 2011 Posted by | Herman Cain, political humor, political/social, politics, republicans, republicans politics | Leave a comment

Wingnuts: Make Up Your Mind!!!

November 8, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Herman Cain, political humor, politics, republicans, republicans politics | Leave a comment

9-9-9: 9 women, 9 charges, 9 political lives…I’m loving it!

Ok, Herman Cain never stood a snowball’s chance in hell of winning the Republican nomination. However, it appears that he drew enough support from the “anti-Romney’ candidates to worry them (Rick Perry?). Hence the resurfacing of allegations including a new 4’th allegation of sexual harassment.

Sure many in the Republican establishment are shrugging this off; it is merely a case of slacker gold-diggers trying to get rich at the expense of a famous person:

Moreover, people are on to the sexual-harassment scam. In typical fashion, Congress took a situation where women had no protection for legitimate grievances and created a solution rife with unintended consequences. Now businesses are regularly making payouts for the flimsiest of reasons. It’s obvious that these alleged victims and their lawyers β€” no matter what they may say publicly β€” are champing at the bit to come forward for their day in the limelight and the inevitable book deal. Who can pass up being the new Anita Hill, who to this day periodically receives glowing newspaper profiles?

(yes, this came from Fred Thompson, or someone writing for Mr. Thompson)

Anyway, I love it when Republicans go after one another. Pass the popcorn!!!

But the funniest take comes from this Tom Tomorrow Cartoon: “Will the pretend candidacy of a man who never had a remote chance of winning the nomination let alone winning the presidency be derailed by the sexual harassment scandal? ”

Click the thumnail to see the cartoon at the source; it is hilarious!

(the Republicans don’t play nice, do they? πŸ™‚ )

November 7, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Herman Cain, politics, politics/social, republicans, republicans politics, rick perry | Leave a comment

Republican Command of the Issues (and my workout)

Workout notes: no lifeguard. 😦 But I did walk some and then do squats. Walking: 3 miles easy with Lynn last night and 4 more on the university track this morning in 45:24: 12:43 (all moderate), 11:16 (2-1-2-1-2), 10:53 (1-3-1-3), 10:30 (1-7). The 1’s represent a 200 meter recovery lap. Then I did a few sets of 1-legged squats with the Smith Machine and some high rep leg presses.

Republican Command of Important Geo-Political Issues
Yep, this person is polling 1 or 2 among the GOP presidential hopefuls:

During an interview that aired on PBS’ NewsHour on Monday night, Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain warned that China has indicated it’s “trying to develop nuclear capability.”

After Cain said, “I do view China as a potential military threat to the United States,” the following exchange took place between the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and PBS’ Judy Woodruff:

JUDY WOODRUFF: And what could you do as president to head that off?

HERMAN CAIN: My China strategy is quite simply outgrow China. It gets back to economics. China has a $6 trillion economy and they’re growing at approximately 10 percent. We have a $14 trillion economy — much bigger — but we’re growing at an anemic 1.5, 1.6 percent. When we get our economy growing back at the rate of 5 or 6 percent that it has the ability to do, we will outgrow China.

And secondly, we already have superiority in terms of our military capability, and I plan to get away from making cutting our defense a priority and make investing in our military capability a priority, going back to my statement: peace through strength and clarity. So yes they’re a military threat. They’ve indicated that they’re trying to develop nuclear capability and they want to develop more aircraft carriers like we have. So yes, we have to consider them a military threat.

Oh, well, who would know that China has had nuclear bombs from…oh, 1964?

Hey, it could happen to anyone. πŸ™‚

Speaking of Mr. Cain: his campaign believes that Rick Perry is behind the resurfacing of the sexual harassment allegations.

I told you it wasn’t a Democrat. πŸ™‚

One cynical prediction: if the woman in question is black, Mr. Cain will survive this ok. If she is white: he is toast.

November 3, 2011 Posted by | 2012 election, Herman Cain, politics, politics/social, republicans political/social, republicans politics, rick perry | Leave a comment