blueollie

Get ‘er done! Trump’s approval among men.

Interesting stuff here:

Polling also suggests that Trump could do better in 2020 among men than he did in 2016, but his approval ratings among women of all races are dismal. The Washington Post-Schar School poll conducted June 27-July 2 found that men of all races approve of how Trump is handling the job by 54-45, while women of all races disapprove, 65-32, a 42-point gap. (The gap is determined in this way: If there were no difference between men and women, the gap would be zero. Using this case as an example, men are plus nine on Trump and women are minus 33, which produces a total gap of 42 points.)

[…]

I wrote to Dan McAdams, a professor in the psychology department at Northwestern who studies the Trump presidency. McAdams sent me his views on Trump’s allure:

Trump personifies an approach to leadership that many men find deeply appealing. It is a primal appeal to social dominance. Everybody — men and women — knows that social status can be seized through physical power and threat; the strongest, biggest, and boldest may lord it over the rest of us. But boys and men have more direct experiences of this kind of thing growing up — on the playground, for example, in gym class, in the military, and in various other socialization venues wherein male strength and bravura are praised and deeply prized, even as they also evoke fear and submission.

McAdams cited the comments of the primatologist Jane Goodall, who compared Trump’s behavior to that of a chimpanzee.

“In many ways the performances of Donald Trump remind me of male chimpanzees and their dominance rituals,” Goodall told James Fallows, a writer for The Atlantic in 2016.

In order to impress rivals, males seeking to rise in the dominance hierarchy perform spectacular displays: stamping, slapping the ground, dragging branches, throwing rocks. The more vigorous and imaginative the display, the faster the individual is likely to rise in the hierarchy, and the longer he is likely to maintain that position.

[…]

Kaufmann and Petrocik write:

Men have become increasingly Republican in their party identification and voting behavior since the mid-sixties while the partisanship and voting behavior of women has remained essentially constant.

[…]

Bringing this back to the present, I asked Kaufmann in an email, “What do men see in Trump that women fail to see?” She wrote back:

Trump, in deed and word, is all about men, white men in particular, but men generally. This is rare. The public sphere is filled with conversations regarding the disadvantages faced by racial and ethnic minorities, the LGBTQ community and women. Few candidates, however, are idiotic enough to vocalize the blame for all of this injustice on white men, but white men are always the implicit comparison group. Trump has no problem attacking racial minorities, gays and lesbians, and women when he feels justified. Men have a vocal advocate in Trump, and when he combines his pro-man message with his appeal to working-class racial anxiety — it’s a winning message for him, particularly among white working-class men.

There may be something else going on here. Many men are frustrated by seeing indecisiveness ….”just pick a plan and go with it” is the cry. “GET ‘ER DONE”! Think of Rambo or Dirty Harry characters in the movies. They just ACT and ignore those nerds and their spreadsheets and “what/if” analysis.

The movie Animal House made fun of this a bit; remember that Bluto went on to become a US Senator.

Incremental change that you need a spreadsheet to see? Reduced deaths/injuries due to this policy or that policy..a change that one needs to evaluate data to see? Phooey. That is Obama stuff.

Pounding the fist on the desk and yelling…THAT is what we are talking about!!!

I think that things will have to get very bad at the moment to drive men away from Trump (e. g. economic crash, bungled emergency response); long term competence is not a political winner.

Advertisements

July 12, 2018 Posted by | politics, politics/social, social/political | Leave a comment

“That s**t ends today”, “we are going to do this or that”……HOW?

Rant:

Here we go again. If you follow liberals on social media, you frequently find these sorts of posts. I deleted the name because it isn’t my intention to attack an individual but rather, an idea.

Here you have a white feminist saying what “women are going to do” and “going to end”.

Yeah, sure.

For one thing, educated feminists really don’t speak to many working class women. They really don’t speak to feminists of color, either. And judging from the exit polls, they don’t even speak for white women.


(via CNN)

Yes, women of color rejected Trump by large margins, but white women make up a greater percentage of the electorate than: white men or men of color, or women of color.

So, if you are going to bellow “this s**t ends yesterday”, my question is: “how, exactly”? Frankly, you are just popping off…again.

Of course, this group isn’t the only one that does that; I believe that most groups do this to one extent or another.
They know (more or less) how their friends and relatives vote, so they are SURE that they represent the majority..or at least the plurality of Americans or even people in a region.

For example: one of my high school classmates tried to tell me that my old Central Texas area was conservative, despite Travis County (where Austin, TX is) going for Clinton by 66 percent.

Now I won’t deny that there are some promising signs for the 2018 midterms, but if we gain, it will not be because of huge shift among white women; remember that they backed Moore over Jones with 63 percent of the vote.

For more on the increasing chasm (fueled, at least in part, by white men becoming more Republican and more pro-Trump), read this.

July 12, 2018 Posted by | politics, politics/social, ranting, social/political | Leave a comment

One out too many…

When should a coach put in the relief pitcher? That isn’t always an easy call.

In the top of the 6’th it was 1-1, with Peoria and Lake County getting one home run apiece. It had been a quick game with lots of “one pitch” outs (fly balls to the outfield, mostly). There were two outs ..followed by …
3 singles and a home run (3 run shot). That made it 5-1 which was to be the final score of the 2:30 game. I’d never seen so many quick innings.

The Captains’ starting pitcher threw 7 innings and scattered 3 hits (one home run). The Chiefs hit the ball better than the box score might indicated..but there were a ton of “warning track” flies and line drives hit right to someone.
The Chiefs’ starting pitcher threw 5 2/3 excellent innings…but then .one out too many.

Underway in Dozer. Lake County at Peoria.

A post shared by Ollie Nanyes (@ollienanyes) on

Pretty night for baseball though. I can recommend the week night games; great seats and nut much crowding.

July 12, 2018 Posted by | baseball | | Leave a comment