Yeah, I could be writting about the latest Obama-Clinton dust up (over whether or not they would meet with heads of state from countries that are hostile to us).

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama tried to turn rival Hillary Rodham Clinton’s words back on her Wednesday, saying her vote to authorize the Iraq war was “irresponsible and naive.”

Clinton had used the same language a day earlier to criticize Obama for saying he would be willing to meet with leaders of nations such as Cuba, North Korea and Iran without conditions within the first year of his presidency. Clinton said renegade leaders could use such a meeting for propaganda and that envoys below the presidential level should begin diplomatic work.

Obama told NBC News it’s obvious that the diplomatic spade work must be done before any such meeting. But he wants to change Bush administration policies that freeze out enemies and move to a principle that says the United States should talk with everybody.

“The notion that I was somehow going to be inviting them over for tea next week without having initial envoys meet is ridiculous,” he said in an interview outside his Senate office. “But the general principle is one that I think Senator Clinton is wrong on, and that is if we are laying out preconditions that prevent us from speaking frankly to these folks, then we are continuing with Bush-Cheney policies.”

Obama’s comment about meeting with foreign foes came in response to a question in a Democratic presidential debate Monday night. The Clinton campaign immediately highlighted his statement as evidence that he doesn’t have the foreign policy skills to be president. “I thought that was irresponsible and frankly naive,” she told the Quad-City Times of Iowa.

Later Wednesday, the Clinton campaign issued a statement by former U.N. Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, who is supporting her candidacy, taking issue with Obama’s comments and saying she would bring an end to “the cowboy approach of the Bush years.”

“She has said she would initiate serious, responsible dialogue with nations with whom we don’t agree in order to further the national security interest of the United States,” Holbrooke said. “But she is right not to risk the prestige of the presidency by unconditionally committing to meet with leaders of adversarial nations.”

But there are bigger issues at stake here.

The ever vigilant conservative pundits and bloggers have discovered a deep dark secret:

Hillary Clinton is a female mammal and therefore HAS BOOBS!

As J. Lopez says:

Zarqawi might have knocked Ann Coulter out of the headlines and off our TV screens for the moment, but Hillary Clinton this morning seems to be dressing to full-out take on Ann….Senator Clinton’s blazer is a bit lowcut today (I have C-SPAN 2 on).

UPDATE: Here’s a screenshot. Prediction: Washington Post Style section piece by a Pulitzer Prize winner about Hillary’s sex-appeal advantage.

The “boob shots”:

Oh gosh, not another Clinton “boobgate” scandal?!?! (scroll all the way down).

As one “conservative” blogger (chuckle) puts it, this emboldens Al-Qeda! (yes, I know that it is a spoof blog…) πŸ˜‰

July 27, 2007 - Posted by | hillary clinton, obama, Peoria/local, politics/social


  1. […] been interested in the Obama-Clinton duel of late. Much of this started when Obama said that he’d meet with heads of state of hostile nations, and Clinton called him naive to say that. (no, this has nothing to do with Senator Clinton’s […]

    Pingback by Having Public Savvy « blueollie | August 1, 2007 | Reply

  2. Hillary’ boobs

    Comment by Helen Trimble | August 2, 2007 | Reply

  3. Note: to catch Helen Trimble’s reply, click on her name (it links to a very short youtube video. πŸ™‚

    Comment by blueollie | August 3, 2007 | Reply

  4. […] see the some of the sexist treatment, check out the “cleavage” incident and this nasty rumor) Note to Tennessee Guerilla Women: it was a woman who started, or at least ran […]

    Pingback by To Hillary Supporters: “Unfair” isn’t always sexist « blueollie | November 6, 2007 | Reply

  5. […] to me, not all mentions of a woman politician’s appearance is sexist, though I did find this “Hillary’s blouse is chosen to show her breasts” stuff to be idiotic (and yes, it was brought up by a wingnut woman). Possibly related posts: […]

    Pingback by Sexisim and the Democratic Primary « blueollie | June 5, 2008 | Reply

  6. damn, I’d like to titty fuck that bitch

    Comment by Dick Rasch | October 30, 2008 | Reply

  7. classy.

    Comment by blueollie | October 30, 2008 | Reply

  8. Speaking of Hillary Clinton:

    There is bad news about her husband.

    It is opined that Bill Clinton committed racist hate crimes, and I am not free to say anything further about it.

    Respectfully Submitted by Andrew Y. Wang, J.D. Candidate
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    (I can type 90 words per minute, and there are probably thousands of copies on the Internet indicating the content of this post. Moreover, there are innumerable copies in very many countries around the world.)
    β€œIf only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Off the top of my headβ€”it came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

    Comment by Wang | March 19, 2009 | Reply

  9. I’ve got a pic of Hillary Clinton’s earliest Voting attempt, in Time square NYC.
    I’ve got a Physical Photograph not a digital Saved image.

    Its a frontal image of Her Lifting shirt in Public, shows bolth boobs, & she’s painted vote Hillary on them!

    Once I edit\blur a copy of my Photo, I’ll post it…..
    I will NOT DO SO NO for fear of Negative Response by the Now very Powerful Clinton’s capabilities.
    E-mail @
    If you’re willing too Buy$$$ my Photo. & I’ll show u notBlurred imagery……

    Until then. 😎

    Comment by Tavis | March 1, 2018 | Reply

  10. Did she paint vote Hillary on her boobs, or did she get someone else to do it (maybe Bill….)

    Just thinking it would be quite difficult to do herself, cos she’d have to paint upside down and back to front………

    These are important questions !


    Comment by Handy Bendy Ghandi | March 22, 2018 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: