What a Dilemma!
Question: when does one’s freedom to raise a child as they see fit end and when does the welfare of the child begin? Sure this is in Canada, but it is still of interest to me.
Nikki’s Nest has a story about a Neo-Nazi couple that lost parental rights due to their beliefs. Ok, how about parents who were, say, CCC members? Or, what about parents to thought that the book The Bell Curve was a good book?
What about parents who teach their kids that the universe is only 6000 years old? What about those who teach Nation of Islam beliefs?
Does the government have a role in the approval or disapproval of a philosophy?
I am not taking a side as yet; I’ll have to think about it some more.
Advertisement
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- February 2012 (56)
- January 2012 (87)
- December 2011 (68)
- November 2011 (86)
- October 2011 (94)
- September 2011 (86)
- August 2011 (83)
- July 2011 (70)
- June 2011 (90)
- May 2011 (93)
- April 2011 (79)
- March 2011 (68)
-
Categories
- 2008 Election
- 2010
- 2010 election
- 2012 election
- Aaron Schock
- Ad
- affirmative action
- Agricultural Commisioner
- aircraft
- Alabama
- alternative energy
- america
- April 1
- arizona
- astronomy
- atheism
- Barack Obama
- barback obama
- Barbara Boxer
- basketball
- bicycling
- Biden
- big butts
- bikinis
- bill maher on mosque
- bill richardson
- biology
- blog humor
- Blogroll
- blogs
- blood donation
- Bobby Jindal
- books
- boxing
- brain
- bush-era
- business & economy
- civil liberties
- Claire McCaskill
- college football
- comedy
- cop
- cosmology
- creationism
- d k hirner
- dark energy
- deadline
- Democrats
- Dick Durbin
- Dick Morris
- disease
- dk hirner
- draw Mohammad day
- draw Muhammad day
- economics
- economy
- education
- edwards
- energy
- entertainment
- environment
- evolution
- extension
- family
- flu
- football
- Fox News Lies Again
- free speech
- Friends
- frogs
- geese
- glenn beck
- glenn hubbard
- green news
- ground zero mosque
- gwen ifill
- haunting songs
- health
- health care
- Herman Cain
- High Speed Rail
- hiking
- hillary clinton
- hsr
- huckabee
- human sexuality
- humor
- if rich people have to pay taxes
- IL-17
- IL-18
- Illinois
- immigration. racial profiling
- injury
- internet issues
- interviews
- islamophobia
- jan brewer
- jim lehrer
- job
- Joe Biden
- John McCain
- jon stewart
- Judicial nominations
- knee rehabilitation
- lahood
- liars
- marathons
- mathematics
- matter
- mccain
- michelle bachmann
- Mid Life Crisis
- Middle East
- Mike Huckabee
- mike's blog round up
- mind
- Mitt Romney
- money
- moron
- morons
- movies
- nanotechnology
- national disgrace
- nature
- Navel Staring
- NBA
- neuroscience
- newshour
- Newt Gingrich
- NFL
- north america
- north carolina
- obama
- Peoria
- Peoria/local
- Personal Issues
- photos
- physics
- Political Ad
- political humor
- political/social
- politics
- politics/social
- poll
- poor
- poverty
- public policy and discussion from NPR public radio program Science Friday with host Ira Flatow. Science Videos
- pwnd
- quackery
- racewalking
- racism
- ranting
- rebulican party
- recession
- relationships
- religion
- Republican
- republican party
- republican senate minority leader
- republicans
- republicans political/social
- republicans politics
- resume
- rich
- rick perry
- rick santorum
- running
- Rush Limbaugh
- sarah palin
- sb1070
- science
- Science Friday teachers
- Science Friday teens.
- SCOTUS
- shinkansen
- shoulder rehabilitation
- sickness
- social/political
- space
- spandex
- Spineless Democrats
- sports
- statistics
- stem cells
- stephen colbert
- summer
- superstition
- swimming
- tax cuts
- taxes
- technology
- the colbert report
- Tim Pawlenty
- time trial/ race
- training
- trains
- Transportation
- travel
- ultra
- Uncategorized
- walking
- war on drugs
- wealth
- weight training
- whining
- wise cracks
- workouts
- world events
- WTF
- yoga
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS














Good questions, but it really seems to me that the government shouldn’t be approving or disapproving of anyone’s philosophy. I think that sets dangerous precedent. Whose philosophy is correct? What if the philosophy the government deems suitable is at odds with your own?
Living in Utah there is a lot of noise about parental rights, and here it does go too far sometimes; last week the legislature wanted to alter child car seat laws (relax them) to give parents more choice. This will result in direct physical harm to children, and clearly this is wrong. Parents refusing life-saving medical treatment for philosophical reasons is also a case where government ought to get involved.
But it really is a violation of freedom of speech and freedom of religion for the government to tell parents they cannot teach their children a philosophy of their choice, even if science says it is wrong. I am no 6-day creationist (shudder), but I defend the right of my neighbors to teach young earth creationism to their children if they so choose.