blueollie

John McCain: a Bush-Cheney Sockpuppet; nothing more

Folks, I am embarrassed to admit that I fell for the Sarah Palin diversion hook, line and sinker.

Despite what some might say, McCain’s pick of Palin was no maverick move. In fact, indications are that she isn’t even who he wanted. Think about it: McCain met Palin this February and only talked to her once after that.

John McCain first met Sarah Palin only six months ago and had just one conversation with the Alaska governor before offering her the vice presidential slot on the Republican ticket, the Arizona senator’s campaign said Friday.

The move appears to be a marked departure for McCain — a man known for his tendency to surround himself with a close circle of advisers and politicians he has long felt comfortable with.

But according to the McCain campaign, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee first met Palin in Washington at a February 2008 National Governors Association meeting. He was immediately impressed with the 44-year-old rising GOP star, and decided to consider her for the vice presidential slot.

McCain campaign manager Rick Davis had several conversations with Palin throughout the vetting process, but McCain himself didn’t speak with the Alaska governor until last Sunday — one day after Barack Obama named Joe Biden to his ticket. It was then McCain reached Palin by phone while she was at the Alaska State Fair to discuss the possibility of joining the ticket.

Remember, this by the McCain campaign’s admission. Heck, most of us take more care when choosing a car.

McCain probably wanted Lieberman

ABC’s Jan Crawford Greenburg reports: It wasn’t until Sunday night that John McCain, after meeting with his four top advisers, finally decided he could not tap independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut to be his running mate. One adviser, tasked with taking the temperature of the conservative base, had strongly made the case to McCain that it would be a disaster for the party and that the base would revolt. McCain concluded he could not go that route.

(emphasis mine).

In short, McCain caved in to the extreme right wing of his party, as Robert Reich pointed out:

McCain’s choice of vice president is termed “bold” in today’s headlines but it is not at all bold, if we understand boldness to be the equivalent of courageous and appropriate to the times. To the contrary, the choice suggests that McCain caved to the religious right within the Republican Party, using his pick as a political ploy to
stir their enthusiasm while perhaps attracting a few women who are attracted to a female on a ticket regardless of her views.

Or as John Kerry pointed out the day prior to the Obama speech, before Palin was picked: this was Candidate McCain, not Senator McCain.

I have known and been friends with John McCain for almost 22 years, but every day now I learn something new about Candidate McCain. To those who still believe in the myth of a maverick instead of the reality of a politician, I say let’s compare Senator McCain to Candidate McCain.

Candidate McCain now supports the very wartime tax cuts that Senator McCain once called irresponsible. Candidate McCain criticizes Senator McCain’s own climate change bill. Candidate McCain says he would vote against the immigration bill that Senator McCain wrote.

Are you kidding me, folks?

(Laughter, cheers, applause.)

Talk about being for it before you’re against it!

(Cheers, applause.)

Let me tell you, before he ever debates Barack Obama, John McCain should finish the debate with himself.

(Laughter, applause.)

And what’s more, Senator McCain, who once railed against the smears of Karl Rove when he was the target has morphed into Candidate McCain, who is using the same Rove tactics, the same Rove staff, the same old politics of fear and smear.

Well, not this year; not this time. The Rove-McCain tactics are old and outworn, and America will reject them in 2008.

David Horsey got it right:

As did the Obama campaign, as they reacted so simply:

THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN MORE OF THE SAME. Bush-Cheney and company are still calling the shots, period.

And I was ready to fall for it, hook, line and sinker.

August 31, 2008 - Posted by blueollie | mccain, obama, politics, politics/social, sarah palin | | 5 Comments

5 Comments »

  1. HUH? Excuse me but all you have hear is speculation and irrelevant slander. Neither Bush nor Cheney will be running next election, something you far-lefties need to get through your head. On that note, with reference to the Russia/Georgia situation, Bush deserves his credit since he tried to prevent this conflict by adopting Georgia into NATO, thus protecting it from outsiders, something the Europeans refused to do out of fear with upsetting their natural gas provider. When Dems are talking about sitting down with Russia after such an aggressive move, something is wrong.

    Next, don’t talk about party politics when the Democrats railroaded Bill and Hillary Clinton. If tuesday’s speech says anything, it is that the Clintons were coerced into supporting Obama. It is no surprise that many of her supporters still feel that Hillary got the short end of the stick. If you don’t believe me, go on HillaryClintonForum.net and take a look at the Palin VP thread.

    Next, while Barack talks about putting the people first, it was Palin who, against the wishes for her party, went across the floor to amend the Alaskan gay marriage ban. A move that would guarantee that same-sex couples would have some of the rights that married couples have. She isn’t giving a speech about it, she actually did something about it. As Glenn Beck said, she is a “realistic social conservative”. Although Christianity doesn’t think too much about homosexuality, she used her own head and decided it was their right to be treated equally. Remember that when you decide to call her a religious zealot.

    Finally, it is “more of the same” or “Maverick” because you can’t have it both ways. He is either with his party or is marching to his own beat. Seeing how McCain voted with his party 74% of the time compared to Obama’s 90%, who is really following the pushing for change? On that note, why would a candidate dedicated to “hope and change” pick a Washington Insider? A man who actually did vote in favour of that “bridge to nowhere” which Palin shot down?

    You want to discuss experience and reform? Do your research before trying to take weak shots at a stronger ticket.

    Comment by clancop | August 31, 2008 | Reply

  2. Hmm, “railroaded”? I thought that Obama won because he did better in the primaries; oh yes, who was the favorite and who had the initial lead in super delegates? :)

    As far as “religious zealot”: I am glad that her head was good enough to determine that gays shouldn’t be discriminated against. Too bad her head wasn’t smart enough to determine that creationism isn’t science. :)

    Comment by blueollie | August 31, 2008 | Reply

  3. I think it’s funny how delusional Republicans call Democrats “far left.” It’s like they haven’t figured out that most Dems are conservatives, and most Republicans are on the fringe. This isn’t the 70’s and 80’s anymore.

    Comment by postsimian | August 31, 2008 | Reply

  4. How can this piece of garbage be a featured post? Its the goofiest crap posted today.by the way I like your 3 stooges avatar.

    Comment by harddriller | August 31, 2008 | Reply

  5. You want goofy? Listen to the so called national security expert.

    Comment by blueollie | August 31, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment