Debunking the Clinton Claim that “she’d already be the nominee” by Republican Rules
HRC has claimed that “she’d already be the nominee if we had Republican rules”.
Clinton called her base of support “broader and deeper” than Obama’s, and said, “At the end of the day, that’s what it should be about for Democrats. You know, it is who can better win. And I’ve won the big states. I’ve won the states that we have to anchor. If we had the Republican rules, I would already be the nominee.”
Is that so? I claim that the answer is “no”. Remember that, of the states that have been contested, only Vermont, Virginia, D. C., New York, Missouri, Arizona, New Jersey, Utah and Delaware are winner take all.
So, I crunched the numbers and gave the winner of the “winner take all” states all of the delegates. Note that the Republicans in Louisiana have a weird rule about someone having to get 50% of the vote to get delegates and that the Democrats have a part caucus, part election system in Texas.
I went ahead and kept proportionality in the non-winner take all states.
The result came out 1409 Clinton, 1405 Obama. That is hardly having the nomination wrapped up.
About the table: the middle column has a “y” for the winner take all states, and the left two columns redistribute the delegates according to a “winner take all” basis in these states.
Note: the Republicans distribute the delegates in some of the “non-winner take all” states by “winner take all” in each district but I didn’t go district by district; I felt that the Democratic distribution was a good enough approximation. Note that this may well have added to Obama as Clinton failed to win many districts, say, in Illinois.
| clinton | obama | Rep-wta | clinton-r | Obama-r | |
| alabama | 25 | 27 | 25 | 27 | |
| alaska | 4 | 9 | 4 | 9 | |
| arizona | 31 | 25 | y | 56 | 0 |
| arkansas | 27 | 8 | 27 | 8 | |
| california | 204 | 166 | 204 | 166 | |
| colorado | 20 | 35 | y | 20 | 35 |
| connecticut | 22 | 26 | y | 22 | 26 |
| deleware | 6 | 9 | y | 0 | 15 |
| dc | 3 | 12 | y | 0 | 15 |
| florida | 0 | 0 | |||
| georgia | 27 | 60 | 27 | 60 | |
| hawaii | 6 | 14 | 6 | 14 | |
| Idaho | 3 | 15 | 3 | 15 | |
| Illinois | 49 | 104 | y | 49 | 104 |
| Iowa | 14 | 25 | 14 | 25 | |
| Kansas | 9 | 23 | y | 9 | 23 |
| Louisiana | 22 | 34 | y | 22 | 34 |
| Maine | 9 | 15 | y | 9 | 15 |
| Maryland | 28 | 42 | y | 28 | 42 |
| Massachusetts | 55 | 38 | 55 | 38 | |
| Michigan | 0 | 0 | |||
| Minnesota | 24 | 48 | y | 24 | 48 |
| Mississippi | 13 | 20 | y | 13 | 20 |
| Missouri | 36 | 36 | y | 0 | 72 |
| Nebraska | 8 | 16 | y | 8 | 16 |
| Nevada | 12 | 13 | 12 | 13 | |
| New Hampshire | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| New Jersey | 59 | 48 | y | 107 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 14 | 12 | 14 | 12 | |
| New York | 139 | 93 | y | 232 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | |
| Ohio | 74 | 67 | 74 | 67 | |
| Oklahoma | 24 | 14 | 24 | 14 | |
| Pennsylvania | 85 | 73 | 85 | 73 | |
| Rhode Island | 13 | 8 | 13 | 8 | |
| South Carolina | 12 | 25 | 12 | 25 | |
| Tennesse | 40 | 28 | 40 | 28 | |
| Texas | 94 | 99 | 94 | 99 | |
| Utah | 9 | 14 | y | 0 | 23 |
| Vermont | 6 | 9 | y | 0 | 15 |
| Virginia | 29 | 54 | y | 0 | 83 |
| Washington | 26 | 52 | 26 | 52 | |
| Wisconsin | 32 | 42 | 32 | 42 | |
| Wyoming | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1332 | 1482 | 1409 | 1405 | ||
3 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (82)
- November 2009 (69)
- October 2009 (94)
- September 2009 (81)
- August 2009 (97)
- July 2009 (110)
- June 2009 (81)
- May 2009 (89)
- April 2009 (76)
- March 2009 (91)
- February 2009 (71)
-
Categories
- 2008 Election
- Aaron Schock
- affirmative action
- aircraft
- April 1
- atheism
- Barack Obama
- Barbara Boxer
- bicycling
- Biden
- bikinis
- bill richardson
- blog humor
- Blogroll
- Bobby Jindal
- books
- boxing
- civil liberties
- Claire McCaskill
- college football
- creationism
- Democrats
- Dick Durbin
- disease
- economy
- education
- edwards
- entertainment
- evolution
- family
- flu
- football
- Fox News Lies Again
- free speech
- Friends
- frogs
- geese
- haunting songs
- health care
- High Speed Rail
- hiking
- hillary clinton
- huckabee
- humor
- IL-18
- Illinois
- injury
- Joe Biden
- John McCain
- Judicial nominations
- marathons
- mathematics
- mccain
- Mid Life Crisis
- Middle East
- mind
- morons
- movies
- nature
- NBA
- NFL
- obama
- Peoria
- Peoria/local
- Personal Issues
- political humor
- politics
- politics/social
- poll
- pwnd
- quackery
- racewalking
- racism
- ranting
- relationships
- religion
- republicans
- running
- Rush Limbaugh
- sarah palin
- science
- SCOTUS
- spandex
- Spineless Democrats
- statistics
- superstition
- swimming
- time trial/ race
- training
- Transportation
- travel
- ultra
- Uncategorized
- walking
- whining
- world events
- yoga
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS












I think throughout her meaningless tirades Hillarity has been counting Michigan and Florida as if those were legal primaries.
The GOP is counting half the delegates from MI anf FL. I’m sure that doesn’t get her over the top either, but maybe she thinks she would have gotten enough Supers based on pledged delegates that she would be there.
Cy Guy: remember that the Republicans did campaign in both states, and that Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot in Michigan.
That is why I left them off.