You think that I am Hard on the Clinton Campaign

Workout Notes nothing, again. The body continues to recover; I am now at the “pressure in the head” stage. I feel a bit weak, but the aches and fever appear to be gone, for now. Over the past couple of days I’d have an hour of feeling human, and hour of feeling like death, and so on.

Again, I am writing this down for future reference; of the flu going around here I had a relatively mild case of it. Some of my students ended up in the hospital.

I am thinking that I might start easy 30 minute workouts this week; just long enough to start to break a sweat.

Update Too pretty of a day; I couldn’t resist and went out for an easy 3 mile walk. Minimal coughing; I am substantially better. Still this is about my limit for the next few days. It felt so good to be outside again!

Politics

Do you think that I am hard on the Clinton campaign? Read this article by Fran Rich:

The Clinton camp was certain that its moneyed arsenal of political shock-and-awe would take out Barack Hussein Obama in a flash. The race would “be over by Feb. 5,” Mrs. Clinton assured George Stephanopoulos just before New Year’s. But once the Obama forces outwitted her, leaving her mission unaccomplished on Super Tuesday, there was no contingency plan. She had neither the boots on the ground nor the money to recoup.[...]

Clinton fans don’t see their standard-bearer’s troubles this way. In their view, their highly substantive candidate was unfairly undone by a lightweight showboat who got a free ride from an often misogynist press and from naïve young people who lap up messianic language as if it were Jim Jones’s Kool-Aid. Or as Mrs. Clinton frames it, Senator Obama is all about empty words while she is all about action and hard work.

But it’s the Clinton strategists, not the Obama voters, who drank the Kool-Aid. The Obama campaign is not a vaporous cult; it’s a lean and mean political machine that gets the job done. The Clinton camp has been the slacker in this race, more words than action, and its candidate’s message, for all its purported high-mindedness, was and is self-immolating.

The gap in hard work between the two campaigns was clear well before Feb. 5. Mrs. Clinton threw as much as $25 million at the Iowa caucuses without ever matching Mr. Obama’s organizational strength. In South Carolina, where last fall she was up 20 percentage points in the polls, she relied on top-down endorsements and the patina of inevitability, while the Obama campaign built a landslide-winning organization from scratch at the grass roots. In Kansas, three paid Obama organizers had the field to themselves for three months; ultimately Obama staff members outnumbered Clinton staff members there 18 to 3. [...]

For what will no doubt be the next firewall after March 4, Pennsylvania on April 22, the Clinton campaign is sufficiently disorganized that it couldn’t file a complete slate of delegates by even an extended ballot deadline.

This is the candidate who keeps telling us she’s so competent that she’ll be ready to govern from Day 1. Mrs. Clinton may be right that Mr. Obama has a thin résumé, but her disheveled campaign keeps reminding us that the biggest item on her thicker résumé is the health care task force that was as botched as her presidential bid.

Bill Clinton knocked states that hold caucuses instead of primaries because “they disproportionately favor upper-income voters” who “don’t really need a president but feel like they need a change.” After the Potomac primary wipeout, Mr. Penn declared that Mr. Obama hadn’t won in “any of the significant states” outside of his home state of Illinois. This might come as news to Virginia, Maryland, Washington and Iowa, among the other insignificant sites of Obama victories. The blogger Markos Moulitsas Zúniga has hilariously labeled this Penn spin the “insult 40 states” strategy.

The insults continued on Tuesday night when a surrogate preceding Mrs. Clinton onstage at an Ohio rally, Tom Buffenbarger of the machinists’ union, derided Obama supporters as “latte-drinking, Prius-driving, Birkenstock-wearing, trust-fund babies.” Even as he ranted, exit polls in Wisconsin were showing that Mr. Obama had in fact won that day among voters with the least education and the lowest incomes. Less than 24 hours later, Mr. Obama received the endorsement of the latte-drinking Teamsters.

If the press were as prejudiced against Mrs. Clinton as her campaign constantly whines, debate moderators would have pushed for the Clinton tax returns and the full list of Clinton foundation donors to be made public with the same vigor it devoted to Mr. Obama’s “plagiarism.” And it would have showered her with the same ridicule that Rudy Giuliani received in his endgame. With 11 straight losses in nominating contests, Mrs. Clinton has now nearly doubled the Giuliani losing streak (six) by the time he reached his Florida graveyard. But we gamely pay lip service to the illusion that she can erect one more firewall. [...]

The rest of the article is just as biting! Of course, Obama hasn’t won yet; not by a long shot.

On a slightly different note, someone at the Kos wondered who was still supporting Clinton, and suggested that, because there are still Clinton supporters, there must be some major flaw with Obama. That really isn’t the case; a few might think that she would be do a better job, there are some who think that this is “their turn to have a woman president” (scroll to the bottom of the page and click the video), and some who actually want Bill Clinton back near the White House.

I will say this though: if Clinton pulls it out, she had better retool her campaign from top to bottom, else we will have President McCain.

Obama Responds to Clinton’s “blow up”:

Ben Smith over at Politico posted an email from a colleague relaying Obama’s genius response to Hillary’s throwing down the guantlet today.

Firing back at Hillary’s criticism of his NAFTA mailers here, Obama said tonight that she can’t pick and choose from her husband’s administration.

“You can’t be for something or take credit for an administration and 35 years of experience and then when you run for president suggest somehow you didn’t really mean what you said back then,” Obama said to applause at a rally of about 5,000. “It doesn’t work that way.”

He said Clinton had in fact supported the trade deal that is blamed for thousands of job losses in the industrial hub of this state and that is viewed as something akin to cancer by Ohio Democrats.

“The truth is that Sen. Clinton supported NAFTA before she ran for president. That is indisupatable. She called it ‘a victory’ in her book. She told people it has proved its worth. T hose are facts.”

This is the perfect response and Clinton opened up a long overdue opportunity today for Obama to nail her on the 35 years experience argument. More below the fold.