<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: up and at &#8216;em!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/up-and-at-em/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/up-and-at-em/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 17 July Part Two &#171; blueollie</title>
		<link>http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/up-and-at-em/#comment-29271</link>
		<dc:creator>17 July Part Two &#171; blueollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueollie.wordpress.com/?p=789#comment-29271</guid>
		<description>[...] note that in the 2008 primary election, our results looked like: I did some number crunching from the election statistics and found the following in Peoria County [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] note that in the 2008 primary election, our results looked like: I did some number crunching from the election statistics and found the following in Peoria County [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Family Feud: Obama Vs. Clinton &#171; blueollie</title>
		<link>http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/up-and-at-em/#comment-26915</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Family Feud: Obama Vs. Clinton &#171; blueollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueollie.wordpress.com/?p=789#comment-26915</guid>
		<description>[...] blueollie Politics, Ultra Endurance Sports, Science, Mathematics, Social Issues, Yoga, Sports and Photos.      &#171; up and at&#160;&#8216;em! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blueollie Politics, Ultra Endurance Sports, Science, Mathematics, Social Issues, Yoga, Sports and Photos.      &laquo; up and at&nbsp;&#8216;em! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueollie</title>
		<link>http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/up-and-at-em/#comment-26914</link>
		<dc:creator>blueollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueollie.wordpress.com/?p=789#comment-26914</guid>
		<description>Actually, Obama has every right to lobby the superdelegates to vote for him, just as HRC does.  Yes, those are the rules, and O has the right to make his case.

Public financing:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170003?f=h_latest

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Times editorial reported that Obama &quot;answered with a firm &#039;yes&#039; when asked if he would participate in public financing, should the Republican nominee do the same.&quot; The editorial then &quot;urge[d] Mr. Obama to return to that position.&quot; Earlier, the editorial asserted that &quot;McCain is now the presumptive Republican nominee and says he is eager to take Mr. Obama up on the idea if he beats Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.&quot; McCain said on March 1, 2007, that if he became the Republican nominee, he would accept public funds, provided the Democratic nominee did as well. However, the Times reported on February 13 that &quot;Mr. McCain&#039;s advisers said that the candidate, despite his signature legislative efforts to restrict the money spent on political campaigns, would not accept public financing and spending limits for this year&#039;s general campaign.&quot; Moreover, in a February 15 article reporting that the &quot;McCain campaign&#039;s latest stand on the issue&quot; is that it will accept public funding if McCain&#039;s Democratic opponent does the same, the Times similarly reported: &lt;b&gt;&quot;On Tuesday, one of Mr. McCain&#039;s advisers told The New York Times that the campaign had decided to forgo public financing in the general election, an awkward admission for a senator who has made campaign finance reform a central part of his political persona.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Obama has every right to lobby the superdelegates to vote for him, just as HRC does.  Yes, those are the rules, and O has the right to make his case.</p>
<p>Public financing:</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170003?f=h_latest" rel="nofollow">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170003?f=h_latest</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The Times editorial reported that Obama &#8220;answered with a firm &#8216;yes&#8217; when asked if he would participate in public financing, should the Republican nominee do the same.&#8221; The editorial then &#8220;urge[d] Mr. Obama to return to that position.&#8221; Earlier, the editorial asserted that &#8220;McCain is now the presumptive Republican nominee and says he is eager to take Mr. Obama up on the idea if he beats Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.&#8221; McCain said on March 1, 2007, that if he became the Republican nominee, he would accept public funds, provided the Democratic nominee did as well. However, the Times reported on February 13 that &#8220;Mr. McCain&#8217;s advisers said that the candidate, despite his signature legislative efforts to restrict the money spent on political campaigns, would not accept public financing and spending limits for this year&#8217;s general campaign.&#8221; Moreover, in a February 15 article reporting that the &#8220;McCain campaign&#8217;s latest stand on the issue&#8221; is that it will accept public funding if McCain&#8217;s Democratic opponent does the same, the Times similarly reported: <b>&#8220;On Tuesday, one of Mr. McCain&#8217;s advisers told The New York Times that the campaign had decided to forgo public financing in the general election, an awkward admission for a senator who has made campaign finance reform a central part of his political persona.&#8221;</b></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Andy</title>
		<link>http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/up-and-at-em/#comment-26913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueollie.wordpress.com/?p=789#comment-26913</guid>
		<description>I guess if you think this is fair when it benefits Obama, the fact that superdelegates may swing the nomination to Clinton is okay too (undemocratic as it seems to this conservative).  After all, the system has been in place for 20 years and Clinton just figured it out before Obama.  Gotta stick by the rules, huh?

By the way, why haven&#039;t I see you call for Obama to stick to his pledge to go with public financing in the general election?  Or are his &quot;new&quot; politics just like the old politics?

X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you think this is fair when it benefits Obama, the fact that superdelegates may swing the nomination to Clinton is okay too (undemocratic as it seems to this conservative).  After all, the system has been in place for 20 years and Clinton just figured it out before Obama.  Gotta stick by the rules, huh?</p>
<p>By the way, why haven&#8217;t I see you call for Obama to stick to his pledge to go with public financing in the general election?  Or are his &#8220;new&#8221; politics just like the old politics?</p>
<p>X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
