blueollie

2008 Presidential Race: my worst nightmare

(note: Hillary Clinton’s photo gallery is here)

First some disclaimers: the 2008 primaries have a long way to go; Clinton does not have it wrapped up yet, and the Republican race is likewise undecided.

Also, I am the guy who was actually afraid of Fred Thompson. :)

So my analysis, ok, rambling thoughts, are worth exactly what you are paying to read them. :)

So here goes:

Frankly, I think that the Republicans would be dumb not to nominate John McCain; that guy could well draw enough independent voters and Democratic voters to win, provided the Democratic nominee were Hillary Clinton.

On one hand, HRC would win over many Republican and Independent women, especially if it appears that “the boys” are picking on her:

Will women vote for Hillary Clinton only because she’s a woman?

That question keeps getting bounced around and I’ve recently revised my answer from “no” to “yes.”

That is, yes, women will vote for Clinton because she’s a woman — if men target her as a woman.

Translation: Gentlemen, if you don’t want another Clinton in the White House, do not say unkind things about her persona, demeanor, appearance — even if bull’s-eye true. Not even in your own kitchen with your own wife.

Women have radar for anti-woman sentiments — and all guys have them to some degree. Blame Mom, if you haven’t already. And no one has benefited more from being a victim than the candidate formerly known as Hillary Rodham Clinton. [...]

When Clinton’s campaign recently played the victim card following a debate in which the other top Democratic candidates “piled on,” they misspent her gender equity. The men weren’t piling on because she’s a woman, but because she’s the leading candidate, as Clinton subsequently acknowledged.

Invoking sexism was a risky strategy that almost worked, but not quite. Enough women navigate all-male boardrooms without needing special protections. They and others in more traditional roles were surely insulted by the implication that a woman running for president needs special handling. They’ve come too far to bat those lashes.

But. Let men criticize Clinton personally and a funny thing happens. Contaminating the air is a slight whiff of misogyny that women recognize and recoil against. When men speak derogatorily about Clinton’s looks, all women feel a little bit wounded. What woman can withstand such scrutiny, after all? [...]

Bottom line: What women have in common with Hillary Clinton will always exceed what they have in common with men. This is powder room wisdom. Two women can disagree on the most controversial issues at the table, but when they head to the ladies’ room, inevitably together, they see eyeball to eyeball real fast over the most basic, and ultimately most important, matters.

Hair, for instance. But also, seriously, children, family, life, love and those mysterious creatures — men. Women may cut each other’s throat for a man’s affections, but most will also come to a sister’s aid when men behave badly. It’s human nature to empathize with the pain of those most like us. [...]

On the other hand, in a McCain-Clinton race, male independents and even many male Democrats will desert her in droves. No, I am not saying that I will; in fact I will vote for her.

But this is a common theme that you see, even on places like the Daily Kos.

Some of it will be because McCain is a genuine hero that is respected by many. But some of it will be a reaction to sentiments like those expressed in this blog and to things like this.

This race, if it indeed happens, will be one of the biggest male-female foodfights we’ve seen in a while. This race would be difficult to poll too; in my opinion, many “pw-ed” men, in the presence of their wives, will say that they are voting for Clinton but won’t, and the reverse will be true for women who are married to domineering men.

So, if this is what we end up with, my “public” campaign service would be limited to working the Senator Durbin reelection campaign and with our local State House race.

But my contribution to the Clinton campaign, besides my vote, will be limited to sending them a bit of change here, maybe some discretely made calls there (you can often use your cell phone minutes for campaign work; mostly you’d call fellow Democrats to remind them of an event or rally).

But in public, I’ll be keeping my big mouth shut (for once in my life).

January 21, 2008 - Posted by blueollie | hillary clinton, mccain, politics/social | | 3 Comments

3 Comments »

  1. I agree…. a Clinton VS McCain election will result in another 4 years for the GOP, I keep waiting for the DNC to sponsor the systematic destruction of HRC just like they did to Howard Dean. Oh yeah, Bill Clinton and Terry McCoulough where behind that…

    The more I see of this primary the more I recall I was completely sick of the Clinton’s by 2000. The Bill Clinton legacy is GWB sucks beyond all belief and we are all nostalgic for the dot com boom.

    Obama 08

    Comment by ducksew | January 21, 2008 | Reply

  2. Sheesh…someone thinks they’ve figured out how women think. Interesting…also that’s a big picture of Hillary you got on there! Prophetic?
    I don’t claim to know who will win. Heck when I took a test by picking the issues of each candidate it was Kucinich I found out I was in tune with.
    So I’ll quietly support my choice and leave you brains to battle it out. Frankly I’m sick of all the name calling and hate filled comments made…no not from the candidates but from their supporters!

    Comment by Rose | January 21, 2008 | Reply

  3. Hey Sis, the photos I used were the official US Senate photos of each candidate.

    By the way, the columnist I quoted was Kathleen Parker, who is a Republican shill. Interestingly enough, Barbara agrees with this analysis.

    Barbara says that she will vote for the D and likes HRC but likes O better.

    Obviously, I don’t know who will win.

    About D. K.: yes, I agree with him on more issues, but if by some miracle he got elected, we’d get action on NONE of them. If O or HRC got elected, we’d get action on at least a few of them.

    Example: O has said that if we could just start from scratch, he would push for true universal health care (as Kucinich supports), but that is an impossible goal to achieve from where we are now.

    ducksew: Obviously, I support O, but HRC might win, provided she could build a bridge to many Republican and Independent women. But it is my fear that it will turn out as you say; whether or not that fear is reasonable I don’t know.

    I just hope that the GOP nominates Huckabee, Romney or someone who won’t be as hard to beat.

    Comment by blueollie | January 21, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment